<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Ideas I Found in &#8216;Ambient Findability&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archivemati.ca/2006/07/03/10-ideas-i-found-in-ambient-findability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archivemati.ca/2006/07/03/10-ideas-i-found-in-ambient-findability/</link>
	<description>digital archives consulting and research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:37:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stevie K</title>
		<link>http://archivemati.ca/2006/07/03/10-ideas-i-found-in-ambient-findability/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 07:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archivemati.ca/?p=47#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter,

It&#039;s nice and cozy here.  I think I&#039;ll lurk on your blog more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice and cozy here.  I think I&#8217;ll lurk on your blog more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Van Garderen</title>
		<link>http://archivemati.ca/2006/07/03/10-ideas-i-found-in-ambient-findability/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Van Garderen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archivemati.ca/?p=47#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

Thanks for dropping in on my blog. Eloquent is where I started my career as a &#039;techie archivist.&#039;

You&#039;re right, Ambient Findability is more of a high-level summary and a bit of a prophecy rather than a textbook. However, it is great to have all this disparate information strung together into a cohesive narrative that takes stock of where we are at with Information Architecture in 2005/06 and where we are going  with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping in on my blog. Eloquent is where I started my career as a &#8216;techie archivist.&#8217;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, Ambient Findability is more of a high-level summary and a bit of a prophecy rather than a textbook. However, it is great to have all this disparate information strung together into a cohesive narrative that takes stock of where we are at with Information Architecture in 2005/06 and where we are going  with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kwan</title>
		<link>http://archivemati.ca/2006/07/03/10-ideas-i-found-in-ambient-findability/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archivemati.ca/?p=47#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter,

I was looking for library/archival blogs, and look who I bumped into!  Our paths have crossed before - as of this writing, I&#039;m currently Eloquent&#039;s lead software engineer.  Great to make your acquaintance!

I really enjoyed Ambient Findability, although I found it was kind of vague and cloudy - nothing tangible to grab onto, just a collection of loose ideas.

Peter Morville&#039;s great.  Have you had a chance to look at Information Architecture yet?  It&#039;s a lot longer than Ambient Findability, and as a professional archivist it probably contains a lot of things you already know.  However, it does a great job of tying LIS into Web design.  Most people likely aren&#039;t aware of how closely the two are intertwined.

I&#039;d be really curious to see if folksonomies can be successfully applied to archives, but I have my doubts.  After all, folksonomies are all about emergent patterns - the wisdom of the masses.  They only work if you&#039;ve got thousands and thousands of users in an active community, and very few archives can claim such a user base.  So I guess we&#039;re stuck with time-consuming taxonomies for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter,</p>
<p>I was looking for library/archival blogs, and look who I bumped into!  Our paths have crossed before &#8211; as of this writing, I&#8217;m currently Eloquent&#8217;s lead software engineer.  Great to make your acquaintance!</p>
<p>I really enjoyed Ambient Findability, although I found it was kind of vague and cloudy &#8211; nothing tangible to grab onto, just a collection of loose ideas.</p>
<p>Peter Morville&#8217;s great.  Have you had a chance to look at Information Architecture yet?  It&#8217;s a lot longer than Ambient Findability, and as a professional archivist it probably contains a lot of things you already know.  However, it does a great job of tying LIS into Web design.  Most people likely aren&#8217;t aware of how closely the two are intertwined.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be really curious to see if folksonomies can be successfully applied to archives, but I have my doubts.  After all, folksonomies are all about emergent patterns &#8211; the wisdom of the masses.  They only work if you&#8217;ve got thousands and thousands of users in an active community, and very few archives can claim such a user base.  So I guess we&#8217;re stuck with time-consuming taxonomies for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
